[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1205311342320.2764@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
Date: Thu, 31 May 2012 13:45:13 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
penberg@...nel.org, cl@...ux.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] slab/mempolicy: always use local policy from interrupt
context v3
On Wed, 30 May 2012, Andi Kleen wrote:
> diff --git a/mm/mempolicy.c b/mm/mempolicy.c
> index cfb6c86..b65eb06 100644
> --- a/mm/mempolicy.c
> +++ b/mm/mempolicy.c
> @@ -1586,9 +1586,11 @@ static unsigned interleave_nodes(struct mempolicy *policy)
> * task can change it's policy. The system default policy requires no
> * such protection.
> */
> -unsigned slab_node(struct mempolicy *policy)
> +unsigned slab_node(void)
> {
> - if (!policy || policy->flags & MPOL_F_LOCAL)
> + struct mempolicy *policy = current->mempolicy;
> +
> + if (in_interrupt() || !policy || policy->flags & MPOL_F_LOCAL)
> return numa_node_id();
>
> switch (policy->mode) {
I think the version proposed by David Mackey is more clear, it makes it
obvious that we don't want to dereference current in interrupt context
whereas that relies on short-circuiting your conditional in your approach.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists