[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOJsxLHz7sJytDdDsjXCP4VaR2AFu_dDJchHQuceB11wMGN+Yg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2012 09:41:51 +0300
From: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>, cl@...ux.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] slab/mempolicy: always use local policy from interrupt
context v3
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 11:45 PM, David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 30 May 2012, Andi Kleen wrote:
>
>> diff --git a/mm/mempolicy.c b/mm/mempolicy.c
>> index cfb6c86..b65eb06 100644
>> --- a/mm/mempolicy.c
>> +++ b/mm/mempolicy.c
>> @@ -1586,9 +1586,11 @@ static unsigned interleave_nodes(struct mempolicy *policy)
>> * task can change it's policy. The system default policy requires no
>> * such protection.
>> */
>> -unsigned slab_node(struct mempolicy *policy)
>> +unsigned slab_node(void)
>> {
>> - if (!policy || policy->flags & MPOL_F_LOCAL)
>> + struct mempolicy *policy = current->mempolicy;
>> +
>> + if (in_interrupt() || !policy || policy->flags & MPOL_F_LOCAL)
>> return numa_node_id();
>>
>> switch (policy->mode) {
>
> I think the version proposed by David Mackey is more clear, it makes it
> obvious that we don't want to dereference current in interrupt context
> whereas that relies on short-circuiting your conditional in your approach.
I like it better also. Christoph, Andi?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists