[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.02.1206010934460.2163@tux.localdomain>
Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2012 09:39:20 +0300 (EEST)
From: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
cc: Joonsoo Kim <js1304@...il.com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] slub: change cmpxchg_double_slab in get_freelist() to
__cmpxchg_double_slab
On Mon, 14 May 2012, David Rientjes wrote:
> > On Fri, 11 May 2012, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> >
> > > get_freelist() is only called by __slab_alloc with interrupt disabled,
> > > so __cmpxchg_double_slab is suitable.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Joonsoo Kim <js1304@...il.com>
> >
> > Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
On Thu, 31 May 2012, David Rientjes wrote:
> Pekka, did you want to pick this up so it can get into linux-next?
We now made get_freelist() *require* interrupts to be disabled which
deserves a comment, no?
Also, what do we gain from patches like this? It's somewhat
counterintuitive that we have a function with "cmpxchg" in it which is not
always atomic (i.e. you need to have interrupts disabled).
IIRC, there was even a long rant about this by Linus but I'm unable to
find it in my email archives.
Pekka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists