[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120601064815.GJ7511@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2012 12:18:15 +0530
From: Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched/x86: Calculate booted cores after construction of
sibling_mask
* Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> [2012-05-31 22:30:57]:
(snip)
> >
> > sched/x86: Calculate booted cores after construction of sibling_mask
>
> Why repeat this subject again?
>
Will take care of it from next posting.
(snip)
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c b/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
> > index fd019d7..a8d78f3 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
> > @@ -382,7 +382,12 @@ void __cpuinit set_cpu_sibling_map(int cpu)
> > if ((i == cpu) || (has_mc && match_llc(c, o)))
> > link_mask(llc_shared, cpu, i);
> >
> > - if ((i == cpu) || (has_mc && match_mc(c, o))) {
> > + }
> > +
> > + for_each_cpu(i, cpu_sibling_setup_mask) {
> > + o = &cpu_data(i);
> > +
> > + if ((i == cpu) || (has_mc && match_mc(c, o))) {
> > link_mask(core, cpu, i);
> >
> > /*
>
> This patch actually horribly mangles the indenting. I did the below to
> it:
Sorry about the indentation. Thanks for fixing it.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists