linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] leds: add oneshot blink functions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 01 Jun 2012 09:39:40 -0600
From:	Shuah Khan <shuahkhan@...il.com>
To:	Fabio Baltieri <fabio.baltieri@...il.com>
Cc:	shuahkhan@...il.com, Bryan Wu <bryan.wu@...onical.com>,
	linux-leds@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Richard Purdie <rpurdie@...ys.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] leds: add oneshot blink functions

> 
> There should be no compatibity issues with current timer-trigger calls,
> can you be more specific?

My initial thought was that maybe you could create new namespace for
this trigger instead of using delay_on and delay_off. However, after
looking closely at the patch set you are proposing, since you are using
delay_on and delay_off in led_cdev, I think you are ok.

Please make sure there is no regression in the ledtrig-timer use-cases,
with the changes made to led-class and led-core. 

-- Shuah

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/