[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120604213735.GA1858@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2012 23:37:35 +0200
From: Fabio Baltieri <fabio.baltieri@...il.com>
To: Shuah Khan <shuahkhan@...il.com>
Cc: Bryan Wu <bryan.wu@...onical.com>, linux-leds@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Richard Purdie <rpurdie@...ys.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] leds: add oneshot blink functions
On Fri, Jun 01, 2012 at 09:39:40AM -0600, Shuah Khan wrote:
>
> >
> > There should be no compatibity issues with current timer-trigger calls,
> > can you be more specific?
>
> My initial thought was that maybe you could create new namespace for
> this trigger instead of using delay_on and delay_off. However, after
> looking closely at the patch set you are proposing, since you are using
> delay_on and delay_off in led_cdev, I think you are ok.
Ok, the patch should integrate pretty well with existing software-timer
code, and delay_{on,off} retains the same meaning.
> Please make sure there is no regression in the ledtrig-timer use-cases,
> with the changes made to led-class and led-core.
Of course, I've made many tests with mixes of led_trigger_blink() and
led_trigger_blink_oneshot() calls, and they seems to work samelessly.
Did you have any chance to test it?
If you think that the patch is good I'd like to consider that for
integration, so I can repost a modified version of my can-trigger
patch on the linux-can mailing list.
Fabio
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists