[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4FCCD224.1020307@suse.cz>
Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2012 17:20:04 +0200
From: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>
To: Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
CC: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...il.com>, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
alan@...ux.intel.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Jeff Dike <jdike@...toit.com>,
user-mode-linux-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/24] TTY: um/line, use tty from tty_port
On 06/04/2012 02:01 PM, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> I have two questions: 1. Are these patches also usable on 3.4 and
> 3.3 or do they depend on 3.5's TTY changes?
Hi, I don't think they depend on any changes.
> 2. Why didn't you use tty_port_open()/close()/etc. as Alan
> suggested my in [1]?
This was not intended to fix anything particular. If it does, it is a
pure coincidence... These patches are a minimalistic subset to ensure
every driver has its own tty_port for each tty. We will need this
pairing later.
So the switch of the driver to the new tty port API, as suggested by
Alan, is still needed. I might do that later if I learn how to make
UML work. (The conversion is by definition invasive and needs runtime
testing.)
> [1]
> http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1201.3/01705.html
thanks,
--
js
suse labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists