[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4FCCD70D.5010908@suse.cz>
Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2012 17:41:01 +0200
From: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>
To: Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
CC: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...il.com>, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
alan@...ux.intel.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Jeff Dike <jdike@...toit.com>,
user-mode-linux-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/24] TTY: um/line, use tty from tty_port
On 06/04/2012 05:29 PM, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> It looks like that it solves UML's TTY issues with systemd distros.
> :-)
Good.
>> So the switch of the driver to the new tty port API, as suggested
>> by Alan, is still needed. I might do that later if I learn how to
>> make UML work. (The conversion is by definition invasive and
>> needs runtime testing.)
>
> Two days ago I did so but still faced the problems described here:
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/3/10/163
Hmm, I remember. I suggest you to split the patch into several pieces.
For example moving the code from ->open into ->install can be done
separately. Otherwise it's hard to tell what's wrong with the patch as
a whole.
Also, it would be good to see the patch rebased on the top of my
patch, because tty_port_set/get pieces would be gone from your patch too.
regards,
--
js
suse labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists