[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20120605152845.8b633881.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2012 15:28:45 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Wanpeng Li <liwp.linux@...il.com>
Cc: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...el.com>,
Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@...fusion.mobi>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
James Morris <james.l.morris@...cle.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Michel Lespinasse <walken@...gle.com>,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
Gavin Shan <shangw@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Wanpeng Li <liwp@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] remove no longer use of pdflush interface
On Tue, 5 Jun 2012 17:26:11 +0800
Wanpeng Li <liwp.linux@...il.com> wrote:
> From: Wanpeng Li <liwp@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
>
> ------------------
>
> Change in v2:
>
> * add printk warning
> * add description in Documentation
>
This is not a changelog. The patch should be accompanied by text
explaining the reasons for the removal, the back-compatibility issues,
how they were addressed, etc.
I do agree with the intent of the patch and the creation of
proc_deprecated() seems a good idea - something we can use in the
future.
> --- a/kernel/sysctl.c
> +++ b/kernel/sysctl.c
> @@ -1095,11 +1095,9 @@ static struct ctl_table vm_table[] = {
> .extra1 = &zero,
> },
> {
> - .procname = "nr_pdflush_threads",
> - .data = &nr_pdflush_threads,
> - .maxlen = sizeof nr_pdflush_threads,
> - .mode = 0444 /* read-only*/,
> - .proc_handler = proc_dointvec,
> + .procname = "nr_pdflush_threads",
> + .mode = 0444 /* read-only */,
> + .proc_handler = proc_deprecated,
> },
> {
> .procname = "swappiness",
> @@ -2505,6 +2503,15 @@ int proc_doulongvec_ms_jiffies_minmax(struct ctl_table *table, int write,
>
> #endif /* CONFIG_PROC_SYSCTL */
>
> +/* notice associated proc deprecated */
> +int proc_deprecated(struct ctl_table *table, int write,
> + void __user *buffer, size_t *lenp, loff_t *ppos)
> +{
> + printk(KERN_WARNING "%s exported in /proc is deprecated\n",
> + table->procname);
> + return -ENOSYS;
> +}
I see a couple of things here.
Firstly, I'd change the text from "deprecated" to "is scheduled for
removal". Which implies that the function should be called
proc_obsolete().
Secondly, this code will permit unprivileged users to flood the logs,
by repeatedly reading /proc/sys/vm/nr_pdflush_threads. We try to avoid
this, as it is a form of denial-of-service attack.
This is a bit hard to fix. The typical way of addressing this is to
use printk_once(), so the message only appears once per boot. But that
doesn't work for a generic function - we'd need to add one bit of state
to the ctl_table to do this. We can of course do that, but it's not
obvious that it's _worth_ doing that just for handling obsolete
entries.
So perhaps the solution is to give up on the generic proc_obsolete()
idea, and just add a handler specifically for nr_pdflush_threads, whcih
uses printk_once().
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists