[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20120605154743.53d494e6.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2012 15:47:43 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...nvz.org>
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...allels.com>,
Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@...nvz.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fcntl: Add F_GETOWNER_UIDS option v3
On Tue, 5 Jun 2012 12:25:12 +0400
Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...nvz.org> wrote:
> When we restore file descriptors we would like
> them to look exactly as they were at dumping time.
>
> With help of fcntl it's almost possible, the missing
> snippet is file owners UIDs.
>
> To be able to read their values the F_GETOWNER_UIDS
> is introduced.
>
> This option is valid iif CONFIG_CHECKPOINT_RESTORE
> is turned on, otherwise returning -EINVAL.
um, OK.
But we still have
c-r-prctl-add-ability-to-set-new-mm_struct-exe_file-update-after-mm-num_exe_file_vmas-removal.patch
c-r-prctl-add-ability-to-set-new-mm_struct-exe_file-add-minimal-address-test-to-pr_set_mm.patch
c-r-prctl-add-ability-to-get-clear_tid_address.patch
c-r-prctl-drop-vma-flags-test-on-pr_set_mm_-stack-data-assignment.patch
floating about unmerged due to various unresolved issues. Can we
please get all that stuff nailed down before working on new things?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists