linux-kernel - Re: [tip:perf/core] perf/x86: Fix wrmsrl() debug wrapper

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 06 Jun 2012 09:21:43 -0700
From:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To:	mingo@...nel.org, hpa@...or.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl, tglx@...utronix.de
CC:	linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [tip:perf/core] perf/x86: Fix wrmsrl() debug wrapper

On 06/06/2012 09:15 AM, tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> 
> perf/x86: Fix wrmsrl() debug wrapper
> 
> Move the wrmslr() debug wrapper to the common header now that all the
> include games are gone. Also clean it up a bit to avoid multiple
> evaluation of the argument.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-l4gkfnivwv4yi5mqxjlovymx@git.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>

Could you please call this something like trace_wrmsrl() instead of
silently tacking something onto something else that already had meaning?

	-hpa

-- 
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel.  I don't speak on their behalf.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/