[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJd=RBC7r+a8Q6XvQX5-=0h2d5==tOjyG1HY_1q6=gfBwbWtFw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2012 21:05:01 +0800
From: Hillf Danton <dhillf@...il.com>
To: Emmanuel Benisty <benisty.e@...il.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Manuel Krause <manuelkrause@...nline.de>
Subject: Re: [patch] BFS 420: a tiny step forward
On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 8:37 PM, Hillf Danton <dhillf@...il.com> wrote:
> Hi Emmanuel
>
> On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 11:51 PM, Emmanuel Benisty <benisty.e@...il.com> wrote:
>>
>> Unfortunately, the issue is still there.
>>
> Hang at same place?
>
And try to revert handling CPU_ONLINE, please.
--- a/kernel/sched/bfs.c Sat Jun 2 17:30:28 2012
+++ b/kernel/sched/bfs.c Thu Jun 7 20:58:36 2012
@@ -5352,7 +5352,7 @@ migration_call(struct notifier_block *nf
/* Update our root-domain */
grq_lock_irqsave(&flags);
if (rq->rd) {
- BUG_ON(cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, rq->rd->span));
+ BUG_ON(!cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, rq->rd->span));
set_rq_online(rq);
}
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists