[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+i8gKKDdsG95GFkPskH1fZHBw8oMGu+4DW84Xq1-mLzzgFbrQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2012 17:46:00 +0700
From: Emmanuel Benisty <benisty.e@...il.com>
To: Hillf Danton <dhillf@...il.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Manuel Krause <manuelkrause@...nline.de>
Subject: Re: [patch] BFS 420: a tiny step forward
Hi Hillf,
On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 8:05 PM, Hillf Danton <dhillf@...il.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 8:37 PM, Hillf Danton <dhillf@...il.com> wrote:
>> Hi Emmanuel
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 11:51 PM, Emmanuel Benisty <benisty.e@...il.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Unfortunately, the issue is still there.
>>>
>> Hang at same place?
>>
> And try to revert handling CPU_ONLINE, please.
>
>
> --- a/kernel/sched/bfs.c Sat Jun 2 17:30:28 2012
> +++ b/kernel/sched/bfs.c Thu Jun 7 20:58:36 2012
> @@ -5352,7 +5352,7 @@ migration_call(struct notifier_block *nf
> /* Update our root-domain */
> grq_lock_irqsave(&flags);
> if (rq->rd) {
> - BUG_ON(cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, rq->rd->span));
> + BUG_ON(!cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, rq->rd->span));
>
> set_rq_online(rq);
> }
> --
Sorry for the late reply. This patch did solve the issue, thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists