[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJd=RBD2Ss1vfugZcZzA5CzRPapBJsmx7tAxijBmOgQ9tjC7cw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2012 20:32:34 +0800
From: Hillf Danton <dhillf@...il.com>
To: Emmanuel Benisty <benisty.e@...il.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Manuel Krause <manuelkrause@...nline.de>
Subject: Re: [patch] BFS 420: a tiny step forward
On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 6:46 PM, Emmanuel Benisty <benisty.e@...il.com> wrote:
> Hi Hillf,
>
> On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 8:05 PM, Hillf Danton <dhillf@...il.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 8:37 PM, Hillf Danton <dhillf@...il.com> wrote:
>>> Hi Emmanuel
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 11:51 PM, Emmanuel Benisty <benisty.e@...il.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Unfortunately, the issue is still there.
>>>>
>>> Hang at same place?
>>>
>> And try to revert handling CPU_ONLINE, please.
>>
>>
>> --- a/kernel/sched/bfs.c Sat Jun 2 17:30:28 2012
>> +++ b/kernel/sched/bfs.c Thu Jun 7 20:58:36 2012
>> @@ -5352,7 +5352,7 @@ migration_call(struct notifier_block *nf
>> /* Update our root-domain */
>> grq_lock_irqsave(&flags);
>> if (rq->rd) {
>> - BUG_ON(cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, rq->rd->span));
>> + BUG_ON(!cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, rq->rd->span));
>>
>> set_rq_online(rq);
>> }
>> --
>
> Sorry for the late reply. This patch did solve the issue, thanks.
>
Thank you, Emmanuel.
It is good news before 421-1 is released next week:)
Hillf
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists