[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1339095399.13377.2.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2012 14:56:39 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: David Daney <ddaney.cavm@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-rt-users <linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Carsten Emde <C.Emde@...dl.org>,
John Kacur <jkacur@...hat.com>,
Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RT 3/4] mips-remove-smp-reserve-lock.patch
On Thu, 2012-06-07 at 10:50 -0700, David Daney wrote:
> On 06/07/2012 08:51 AM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > From: Thomas Gleixner<tglx@...utronix.de>
> >
> > Instead of making the lock raw, remove it as it protects nothing.
>
> I don't know how you guys are managing the RT branch, but this seems
> quite similar to:
>
> a3c8b4faeeccb33dbad6969bc9e50bf409f167e7 (MIPS: Cavium: Remove
> smp_reserve_lock.)
Great! Then we don't need to worry about it :-)
But as it doesn't seem that this patch was marked as stable, we will be
carrying it in -rt where we support older kernels.
Should it go to mainline stable?
-- Steve
>
> David Daney
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists