linux-kernel - Re: Deadlock, L2TP over IP are not working, 3.4.1

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20120607223752.GA4475@electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com>
Date:	Fri, 8 Jun 2012 00:37:52 +0200
From:	Francois Romieu <romieu@...zoreil.com>
To:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc:	Denys Fedoryshchenko <denys@...p.net.lb>, davem@...emloft.net,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Deadlock, L2TP over IP are not working, 3.4.1

Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> :
[...]
> If LLTX is used, this means several cpus can execute this code at the
> same time.
> 
> You need percpu stats, or use atomic primitives.

Would adding percpu stats not be frown upon ?

As atomic will defeat the 64 bits stats on 32 bits, I should probably stick
to plain bh disabling lock.

-- 
Ueimor
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/