[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120608054048.GA18796@merkur.ravnborg.org>
Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2012 07:40:48 +0200
From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
To: Don Zickus <dzickus@...hat.com>
Cc: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@...e.com>, x86@...nel.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86,nmi: Fix section mismatch warnings on 32-bit
On Thu, Jun 07, 2012 at 10:06:54PM -0400, Don Zickus wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 07:22:08PM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> > > >> I do not know enough about behind the scene compiler magic to track this
> > > >> down correctly. So any insight/help is greatly appreciated. :-)
> > > >
> > > > We register a function annotated __init. And the normal use of this
> > > > register()
> > > > is for functions that survive the init phase.
> > > > So drop the __init annotation on the function we register and the mismatch
> > > > is fixed.
> > >
> > > But in the case here the function really is being used at init time
> > > only.
> > This is only for testing. Ando nly if CONFIG_DEBUG_NMI_SELFTEST is set.
>
> Hi Sam,
>
> Sorry for ignoring your responses before. Somehow your emails were not
> hitting my inbox for some reason, but I found them in my lkml folder.
>
> So I am confused on the right way to fix this.
>
> Sam is saying drop the __init and Jan is suggesting add __initdata for
> these two special cases.
>
> Anyone want to break the tie? :-)
IMO Jan's approach with __initdata is overkill, but I do not care
much about it.
Sam
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists