[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120608020654.GA18530@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2012 22:06:54 -0400
From: Don Zickus <dzickus@...hat.com>
To: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
Cc: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@...e.com>, x86@...nel.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86,nmi: Fix section mismatch warnings on 32-bit
On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 07:22:08PM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> > >> I do not know enough about behind the scene compiler magic to track this
> > >> down correctly. So any insight/help is greatly appreciated. :-)
> > >
> > > We register a function annotated __init. And the normal use of this
> > > register()
> > > is for functions that survive the init phase.
> > > So drop the __init annotation on the function we register and the mismatch
> > > is fixed.
> >
> > But in the case here the function really is being used at init time
> > only.
> This is only for testing. Ando nly if CONFIG_DEBUG_NMI_SELFTEST is set.
Hi Sam,
Sorry for ignoring your responses before. Somehow your emails were not
hitting my inbox for some reason, but I found them in my lkml folder.
So I am confused on the right way to fix this.
Sam is saying drop the __init and Jan is suggesting add __initdata for
these two special cases.
Anyone want to break the tie? :-)
Cheers,
Don
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists