[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120608105506.GB2185@barrios>
Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2012 19:55:07 +0900
From: Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
Cc: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
stable@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk,
Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [ 31/82] mm/vmalloc.c: change void* into explict vm_struct*
On Fri, Jun 08, 2012 at 03:41:57AM -0700, David Rientjes wrote:
> On Fri, 8 Jun 2012, Ben Hutchings wrote:
>
> > 3.2-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
> >
> > ------------------
> >
> > From: Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>
> >
> > commit db1aecafef58b5dda39c4228debe2c845e4a27ab upstream.
> >
> > vmap_area->private is void* but we don't use the field for various purpose
> > but use only for vm_struct. So change it to a vm_struct* with naming to
> > improve for readability and type checking.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>
> > Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
>
> I'm not sure this is stable material and it wasn't annotated as such when
> it was commited, why should someone need to upgrade their 3.2 for a patch
> like this?
I agree. It's not a stable material.
Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists