[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120608143829.GD1711@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2012 10:38:29 -0400
From: Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@...e.cz>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Subject: Re: processes hung after sys_renameat, and 'missing' processes
On Fri, Jun 08, 2012 at 09:31:38AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > Can you check the compile error that Dave reported for
> > your patch, because right now Dave is running without it, afaik, due
> > to your lock-instance patch not really working in practice.
>
> Oh, missed that in the thread.. yeah here goes.
>
> Now also compile tested with CONFIG_LOCK_STAT...
Doesn't apply against Linus' current tree.
$ cat ../lock| patch -p1
patching file include/linux/lockdep.h
Hunk #1 FAILED at 211.
Hunk #2 FAILED at 254.
Hunk #3 FAILED at 363.
Hunk #4 FAILED at 414.
4 out of 4 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file include/linux/lockdep.h.rej
patching file include/trace/events/lock.h
Hunk #1 FAILED at 61.
Hunk #2 FAILED at 78.
2 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file include/trace/events/lock.h.rej
patching file kernel/lockdep.c
Hunk #1 FAILED at 541.
Hunk #2 succeeded at 556 with fuzz 2.
Hunk #3 FAILED at 3093.
patch: **** malformed patch at line 268: ck,
Dave
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists