linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] inet: Initialize per-netns inetpeer roots in net/ipv{4,6}/route.c

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20120610044339.GA10436@localhost>
Date:	Sun, 10 Jun 2012 12:43:39 +0800
From:	Fengguang Wu <wfg@...ux.intel.com>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, gaofeng@...fujitsu.com,
	containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] inet: Initialize per-netns inetpeer roots in
 net/ipv{4,6}/route.c

On Sat, Jun 09, 2012 at 09:21:47PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: Fengguang Wu <wfg@...ux.intel.com>
> Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 11:16:34 +0800
> 
> > In long run, such build-fix patches can also be auto tested and
> > reported, somehow in this way. You just create a temporary branch
> 
> Sorry, no.

That's fine. Then how about including some text "fix build errors" or
"fix build warnings" or paste the original gcc error/warning messages,
somewhere in the changelog or subject?

That will also allow me recognize that it's a build fix commit and to
make it unconditionally report back any build results.

Thanks,
Fengguang
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/