[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120610044934.GA10507@localhost>
Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 12:49:34 +0800
From: Fengguang Wu <wfg@...ux.intel.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, gaofeng@...fujitsu.com,
containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] inet: Initialize per-netns inetpeer roots in
net/ipv{4,6}/route.c
On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 12:43:39PM +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 09, 2012 at 09:21:47PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> > From: Fengguang Wu <wfg@...ux.intel.com>
> > Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 11:16:34 +0800
> >
> > > In long run, such build-fix patches can also be auto tested and
> > > reported, somehow in this way. You just create a temporary branch
> >
> > Sorry, no.
>
> That's fine. Then how about including some text "fix build errors" or
> "fix build warnings" or paste the original gcc error/warning messages,
> somewhere in the changelog or subject?
>
> That will also allow me recognize that it's a build fix commit and to
> make it unconditionally report back any build results.
Or better, simply include a
Reported-by: Fengguang Wu <wfg@...ux.intel.com>
line in the commit. Then I can reliably detect that it actually tries
to fix some build error/waring reported by me, and verbosely report
back whether the commit actually fix things up.
Thanks,
Fengguang
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists