[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120611082902.GU4400@mwanda>
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 11:29:02 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To: Samuel Iglesias Gonsálvez
<siglesias@...lia.com>
Cc: devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Staging: ipack: remove pr_fmt definition.
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 09:40:04AM +0200, Samuel Iglesias Gonsálvez wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-06-11 at 10:27 +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 10:25:00AM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 08:56:36AM +0200, Samuel Iglesias Gonsalvez wrote:
> > > > As there is no pr_* function used here, pr_fmt is not needed.
> > > >
> > >
> > > Nah. What about if we decide to add some? Also there are actually
> > > a couple pr_err() calls in there already.
> >
> > Oops. Sorry my tree is old. We removed the two calls to pr_err().
>
> Same mistake here. In greg's staging-next the pr_err calls are not
> present so the patch is totally valid but in linus branch they are there
> (this is the reason of my error).
>
> So, this patch is valid, unless we want the pr_fmt definition for the
> future. However, I prefer to delete it.
>
Sure. I guess everything in staging/ipack/ uses dev_err() type
print statements and that includes more information than the the
pr_fmt() macro already.
Acked-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
regards,
dan carpenter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists