linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 8/14] ARM: LPC32xx: Clock adjustment for key matrix controller

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4FD60203.8010103@antcom.de>
Date:	Mon, 11 Jun 2012 16:34:43 +0200
From:	Roland Stigge <stigge@...com.de>
To:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
CC:	arm@...nel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kevin.wells@....com,
	srinivas.bakki@....com, aletes.xgr@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/14] ARM: LPC32xx: Clock adjustment for key matrix controller

Hi,

On 06/11/2012 04:16 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Monday 11 June 2012, Roland Stigge wrote:
>> The clock.c file needs to be changed to match the automatic device name to its
>> clock.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Roland Stigge <stigge@...com.de>
>> Acked-by: Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>
>>
> 
> Should this not be in the same patch as the one that moves the device over
> to DT probing? Otherwise you have a non-working setup if only one patch
> is applied.

The actual driver is new for v3.6 (hopefully), DT-only.

Rather than merging the patches, I'd let the key driver go in via input,
and the clock.c adjustment via arm-soc.

Roland
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/