[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAFR8uecF0LwbV8FvYob5m34sVbKqafrNoYOrcRUQCEOymGnYRA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 10:33:45 -0700
From: Muthu Kumar <muthu.lkml@...il.com>
To: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Jej B <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH UPDATED] block: In blk_execute_rq_nowait, init rq->end_io
before checking for dead queue.
On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 10:40 AM, Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org> wrote:
> On 06/09/12 23:57, Muthu Kumar wrote:
>
>> Locking change is the one you posted already (the link above). Anyway,
>> I have the attached patch *including* the locking change. Original
>> mail has attachment without locking change. Please use whatever you
>> need.
>
>
> While we are at it ... the rq->rq_disk and rq->end_io assignments can be
> performed safely before the spinlock is taken, isn't it ?
>
Yes.. that spinlock is to protect the q.
> Bart.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists