[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4FD4DC26.5080902@acm.org>
Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 17:40:54 +0000
From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
To: Muthu Kumar <muthu.lkml@...il.com>
CC: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Jej B <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH UPDATED] block: In blk_execute_rq_nowait, init rq->end_io
before checking for dead queue.
On 06/09/12 23:57, Muthu Kumar wrote:
> Locking change is the one you posted already (the link above). Anyway,
> I have the attached patch *including* the locking change. Original
> mail has attachment without locking change. Please use whatever you
> need.
While we are at it ... the rq->rq_disk and rq->end_io assignments can be
performed safely before the spinlock is taken, isn't it ?
Bart.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists