[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120611032547.GB10170@linux-sh.org>
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 12:25:47 +0900
From: Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>
To: Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>
Cc: linux-sh@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] irqdomain: Support for static IRQ mapping and
association.
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 07:50:49PM -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
> On Mon, 21 May 2012 14:06:32 +0900, Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org> wrote:
> > +int irq_create_strict_mappings(struct irq_domain *domain, unsigned int irq_base,
> > + irq_hw_number_t hwirq_base, int count)
> > +{
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + ret = irq_alloc_descs(irq_base, irq_base, count,
> > + of_node_to_nid(domain->of_node));
> > + if (unlikely(ret < 0))
> > + return ret;
> > +
> > + ret = irq_domain_associate_many(domain, irq_base, hwirq_base, count);
> > + if (unlikely(ret < 0)) {
> > + irq_free_descs(irq_base, count);
> > + return ret;
> > + }
>
> It would be really good to make sure the hwirqs aren't already
> associated before trying to associate them again. Unfortunately that
> can't be done (nicely) until I get rid of the slow path lookup. I've
> got a patch for that which I'll rebase on top of this one and post soon.
>
Any updates on this? I have quite a few more changes I intend on making,
but there's no point in starting in on that until these existing patches
are sorted out.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists