linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V2 3/3] staging: zram: conventions, line splitting

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CALJ0CeiibyAAJQC4kVxMLTEx=6dzZdzivpfHi4b3W-dst3Ha6w@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 11 Jun 2012 15:08:13 -0700
From:	Sam Hansen <sam@...bo-inc.com>
To:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:	Sam Hansen <solid.se7en@...il.com>,
	Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@...hat.com>,
	Nitin Gupta <ngupta@...are.org>,
	Seth Jennings <sjenning@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 3/3] staging: zram: conventions, line splitting

>  drivers/staging/zram/zram_drv.c |    8 ++++----
>  1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> This patch no longer applies to the tree :(

Hi Greg,
I wrote the patch against Linus' tree
<http://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git>.
Is it more appropriate to write code against your staging tree
<http://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/staging.git>?

Have I been writing code against the wrong tree?  If so,  I'm a huge
tool and sorry for the confusion :p

I'm also doing a huge cleanup of the wan-pmc drivers (cxt1e1) and will
port over to your repo if necessary.

Thanks!

-sam
<solid.se7en@...il.com>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/