[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120611222636.GA22569@kroah.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 15:26:36 -0700
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Sam Hansen <sam@...bo-inc.com>
Cc: devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
Seth Jennings <sjenning@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Nitin Gupta <ngupta@...are.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 3/3] staging: zram: conventions, line splitting
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 03:08:13PM -0700, Sam Hansen wrote:
> > drivers/staging/zram/zram_drv.c | 8 ++++----
> > 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > This patch no longer applies to the tree :(
>
> Hi Greg,
> I wrote the patch against Linus' tree
> <http://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git>.
> Is it more appropriate to write code against your staging tree
> <http://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/staging.git>?
>
> Have I been writing code against the wrong tree? If so, I'm a huge
> tool and sorry for the confusion :p
Problem is, other zram changes just went into my tree, so they probably
conflicted with your changes as well.
So yes, it's best to work against my staging-next branch for coding
style cleanups, or the linux-next tree, either should be fine.
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists