[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1339594622.8980.42.camel@twins>
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2012 15:37:02 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>, acme@...hat.com,
mingo@...e.hu, paulus@...ba.org, cjashfor@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
fweisbec@...il.com, gorcunov@...nvz.org, tzanussi@...il.com,
mhiramat@...hat.com, robert.richter@....com, fche@...hat.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com,
drepper@...il.com, asharma@...com, benjamin.redelings@...cent.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/19] perf: Add ability to attach user level registers
dump to sample
On Wed, 2012-06-13 at 15:12 +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote:
>
> I dont see any limitation except for being incosistent with the rest
> of
> the sample dumps. I'm all for having that PERF_SAMPLE_USER_REGS bit
> and
> the user stack bit as well.
Humm,. we don't have a PERF_SAMPLE_ bit anymore? We should have this.
I was only objecting to this other flag word where you were having one
or two bits set for no apparent reason.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists