[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120614143727.GF7922@escobedo.osrc.amd.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2012 16:37:28 +0200
From: Hans Rosenfeld <hans.rosenfeld@....com>
To: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>
CC: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<tglx@...utronix.de>, <robert.richter@....com>,
<andreas.herrmann3@....com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] x86, fpu: unify signal handling code paths for x86 and
x86_64 kernels
Hi Suresh,
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 05:03:34PM -0700, Suresh Siddha wrote:
> I can split the patch if needed. And I need to do little bit more
> validation (already tested on 64-bit IVB and 32-bit NHM) before
> removing the 'RFC' tag.
>
> I tried starting with the old version of Hans patch. But there were lot
> more changes in this area since then and also his patch had few
> user-visible compatibility issues.
>
> Appended is the version that I came up with. Please review.
Thank you for working on this.
I didn't see anything obviously wrong in a quick review of this code,
but this stuff is too complex for this to mean anything :)
I ran a quick test of your code. I found a signal frame corruption when
running a 32bit test program on a 64bit kernel. I didn't try to find out
why it failed, but I'll send you the test program in a private mail so
you can look at it yourself.
Hans
--
%SYSTEM-F-ANARCHISM, The operating system has been overthrown
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists