[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1339706734.3475.34.camel@sbsiddha-desk.sc.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2012 13:45:34 -0700
From: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>
To: Hans Rosenfeld <hans.rosenfeld@....com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, tglx@...utronix.de,
robert.richter@....com, andreas.herrmann3@....com
Subject: Re: [RFC] x86, fpu: unify signal handling code paths for x86 and
x86_64 kernels
On Thu, 2012-06-14 at 16:37 +0200, Hans Rosenfeld wrote:
> Thank you for working on this.
>
> I didn't see anything obviously wrong in a quick review of this code,
> but this stuff is too complex for this to mean anything :)
>
> I ran a quick test of your code. I found a signal frame corruption when
> running a 32bit test program on a 64bit kernel. I didn't try to find out
> why it failed, but I'll send you the test program in a private mail so
> you can look at it yourself.
>
Ok. The problem was that I was using is_ia32_task() (which uses
TS_COMPAT) to check if the task is a compat task or not. And that flag
is not set during the signal delivery paths for the compat task.
I guess I should be using TIF_IA32 check instead. Using TIF_IA32 check
makes your test case run fine.
Will update it accordingly.
thanks,
suresh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists