| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2012 15:13:31 -0700
From: Silas Boyd-Wickizer <sbw@....edu>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
"Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC patch 1/5] kthread: Implement park/unpark facility
Hello,
Attached is a rough patch that uses park/unpark for workqueue idle
threads. The patch is a hack, it probably has bugs, and it certainly
doesn't simplify the workqueue code. Perhaps, however, the patch
might be useful in guiding future changes to smp_boot_threads or
workqueues.
A difficulty in applying park/unpark (or smp_boot_threads
potentially), it that there is no single per-CPU thread for each CPU.
That is, the thread that starts out as the initial worker/idle thread
could be different from any thread that is idling when a CPU goes
offline. An additional complication is that a per-cpu worker that is
idle may have initially been unbound (e.g. worker creation in the
trustee_thread can cause this).
Silas
Signed-off-by: Silas Boyd-Wickizer <sbw@....edu>
---
kernel/workqueue.c | 114 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
1 file changed, 87 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
index 9a3128d..fb5e18d 100644
--- a/kernel/workqueue.c
+++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
@@ -61,6 +61,7 @@ enum {
WORKER_REBIND = 1 << 5, /* mom is home, come back */
WORKER_CPU_INTENSIVE = 1 << 6, /* cpu intensive */
WORKER_UNBOUND = 1 << 7, /* worker is unbound */
+ WORKER_PARK = 1 << 8,
WORKER_NOT_RUNNING = WORKER_PREP | WORKER_ROGUE | WORKER_REBIND |
WORKER_CPU_INTENSIVE | WORKER_UNBOUND,
@@ -1412,6 +1413,13 @@ fail:
return NULL;
}
+static void __start_worker(struct worker *worker)
+{
+ worker->flags |= WORKER_STARTED;
+ worker->gcwq->nr_workers++;
+ worker_enter_idle(worker);
+}
+
/**
* start_worker - start a newly created worker
* @worker: worker to start
@@ -1423,12 +1431,29 @@ fail:
*/
static void start_worker(struct worker *worker)
{
- worker->flags |= WORKER_STARTED;
- worker->gcwq->nr_workers++;
- worker_enter_idle(worker);
+ __start_worker(worker);
wake_up_process(worker->task);
}
+static void unpark_worker(struct worker *worker)
+{
+ worker->flags &= ~WORKER_PARK;
+ __start_worker(worker);
+ kthread_unpark(worker->task);
+}
+
+static void __disconnect_worker(struct worker *worker)
+{
+ struct global_cwq *gcwq = worker->gcwq;
+
+ if (worker->flags & WORKER_STARTED)
+ gcwq->nr_workers--;
+ if (worker->flags & WORKER_IDLE)
+ gcwq->nr_idle--;
+
+ list_del_init(&worker->entry);
+}
+
/**
* destroy_worker - destroy a workqueue worker
* @worker: worker to be destroyed
@@ -1447,12 +1472,7 @@ static void destroy_worker(struct worker *worker)
BUG_ON(worker->current_work);
BUG_ON(!list_empty(&worker->scheduled));
- if (worker->flags & WORKER_STARTED)
- gcwq->nr_workers--;
- if (worker->flags & WORKER_IDLE)
- gcwq->nr_idle--;
-
- list_del_init(&worker->entry);
+ __disconnect_worker(worker);
worker->flags |= WORKER_DIE;
spin_unlock_irq(&gcwq->lock);
@@ -1464,6 +1484,23 @@ static void destroy_worker(struct worker *worker)
ida_remove(&gcwq->worker_ida, id);
}
+static void park_idle_worker(struct worker *worker)
+{
+ struct global_cwq *gcwq = worker->gcwq;
+
+ BUG_ON(worker->current_work);
+ BUG_ON(!list_empty(&worker->scheduled));
+ BUG_ON(gcwq->first_idle);
+
+ __disconnect_worker(worker);
+ worker->flags = WORKER_PARK | WORKER_PREP;
+
+ spin_unlock_irq(&gcwq->lock);
+ kthread_park(worker->task);
+ spin_lock_irq(&gcwq->lock);
+ gcwq->first_idle = worker;
+}
+
static void idle_worker_timeout(unsigned long __gcwq)
{
struct global_cwq *gcwq = (void *)__gcwq;
@@ -1953,6 +1990,12 @@ woke_up:
return 0;
}
+ if (worker->flags & WORKER_PARK) {
+ spin_unlock_irq(&gcwq->lock);
+ kthread_parkme();
+ WARN_ON(!worker_maybe_bind_and_lock(worker));
+ }
+
worker_leave_idle(worker);
recheck:
/* no more worker necessary? */
@@ -3340,6 +3383,12 @@ static int __cpuinit trustee_thread(void *__gcwq)
gcwq->flags |= GCWQ_MANAGING_WORKERS;
+ if (!gcwq->first_idle && !list_empty(&gcwq->idle_list)) {
+ worker = list_first_entry(&gcwq->idle_list,
+ struct worker, entry);
+ park_idle_worker(worker);
+ }
+
list_for_each_entry(worker, &gcwq->idle_list, entry)
worker->flags |= WORKER_ROGUE;
@@ -3516,15 +3565,7 @@ static int __devinit workqueue_cpu_callback(struct notifier_block *nfb,
if (IS_ERR(new_trustee))
return notifier_from_errno(PTR_ERR(new_trustee));
kthread_bind(new_trustee, cpu);
- /* fall through */
- case CPU_UP_PREPARE:
- BUG_ON(gcwq->first_idle);
- new_worker = create_worker(gcwq, false);
- if (!new_worker) {
- if (new_trustee)
- kthread_stop(new_trustee);
- return NOTIFY_BAD;
- }
+ break;
}
/* some are called w/ irq disabled, don't disturb irq status */
@@ -3540,8 +3581,18 @@ static int __devinit workqueue_cpu_callback(struct notifier_block *nfb,
wait_trustee_state(gcwq, TRUSTEE_IN_CHARGE);
/* fall through */
case CPU_UP_PREPARE:
- BUG_ON(gcwq->first_idle);
- gcwq->first_idle = new_worker;
+ if (!gcwq->first_idle) {
+ spin_unlock_irq(&gcwq->lock);
+ new_worker = create_worker(gcwq, false);
+ if (!new_worker) {
+ if (new_trustee)
+ kthread_stop(new_trustee);
+ return NOTIFY_BAD;
+ }
+ spin_lock_irq(&gcwq->lock);
+ BUG_ON(gcwq->first_idle);
+ gcwq->first_idle = new_worker;
+ }
break;
case CPU_DYING:
@@ -3556,10 +3607,14 @@ static int __devinit workqueue_cpu_callback(struct notifier_block *nfb,
case CPU_POST_DEAD:
gcwq->trustee_state = TRUSTEE_BUTCHER;
- /* fall through */
+ break;
+
case CPU_UP_CANCELED:
- destroy_worker(gcwq->first_idle);
- gcwq->first_idle = NULL;
+ /* If worker is parked, leave it parked for later */
+ if (!(gcwq->first_idle->flags & WORKER_PARK)) {
+ destroy_worker(gcwq->first_idle);
+ gcwq->first_idle = NULL;
+ }
break;
case CPU_DOWN_FAILED:
@@ -3570,17 +3625,22 @@ static int __devinit workqueue_cpu_callback(struct notifier_block *nfb,
wake_up_process(gcwq->trustee);
wait_trustee_state(gcwq, TRUSTEE_DONE);
}
+ BUG_ON(!gcwq->first_idle);
/*
* Trustee is done and there might be no worker left.
* Put the first_idle in and request a real manager to
* take a look.
*/
- spin_unlock_irq(&gcwq->lock);
- kthread_bind(gcwq->first_idle->task, cpu);
- spin_lock_irq(&gcwq->lock);
gcwq->flags |= GCWQ_MANAGE_WORKERS;
- start_worker(gcwq->first_idle);
+ if (!(gcwq->first_idle->flags & WORKER_PARK)) {
+ spin_unlock_irq(&gcwq->lock);
+ kthread_bind(gcwq->first_idle->task, cpu);
+ spin_lock_irq(&gcwq->lock);
+ start_worker(gcwq->first_idle);
+ } else {
+ unpark_worker(gcwq->first_idle);
+ }
gcwq->first_idle = NULL;
break;
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists