[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1339777914.2559.79.camel@twins>
Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2012 18:31:54 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: "Yan, Zheng" <zheng.z.yan@...el.com>
Cc: mingo@...e.hu, jolsa@...hat.com, eranian@...gle.com,
andi@...stfloor.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V6 06/13] perf: Add Nehalem and Sandy Bridge uncore
support
On Fri, 2012-06-15 at 17:28 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-06-15 at 14:31 +0800, Yan, Zheng wrote:
> > @@ -808,6 +994,14 @@ static int __init uncore_cpu_init(void)
> > int ret, cpu;
> >
> > switch (boot_cpu_data.x86_model) {
> > + case 26: /* Nehalem */
> > + case 30:
> > + case 37: /* Westmere */
> > + msr_uncores = nhm_msr_uncores;
> > + break;
> > + case 42: /* Sandy Bridge */
> > + msr_uncores = snb_msr_uncores;
> > + break;
>
> What about WSP-EP (44)? Does it have an uncore similar to the regular
> WSM (37) or WSM-EX / Xeon-E7 (47) ?
I added the 44 and this seems to work.. that is, it didn't die due to
incorrect MSR access quite yet.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists