linux-kernel - [PATCH][ANNOUNCE]RIFS-ES Scheduling V1 release.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CANQmPXip+fKaSYsKaY5TF3Rax=XFFgyh=+BY61snVsgpReL7RA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Sun, 17 Jun 2012 01:18:38 +0800
From:	Chen <hi3766691@...il.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	mou Chen <hi3766691@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH][ANNOUNCE]RIFS-ES Scheduling V1 release.

This is the Googlecode link of RIFS series.
http://code.google.com/p/rifs-scheduler/

Here is the download link for RIFS.ES-v1-kernel3.4.x:
http://rifs-scheduler.googlecode.com/files/RIFS.ES-v1-kernel3.4.x

The design of RIFS/ES:

First let me list out the 3 equations of SystemV scheduling.

  0.cpu = cpu +1;
  1.cpu = cpu/2;
  2.priority = (cpu/2) + base level priority;

These 3 equations are used to determine the scheduling priority if a
task. Here there is no any complex detection of interactive task(O(1)
failed on desktop because of the complex detection). O(1) did a
hard-coding and kerp focusing on how to detect a whether the task is
an interactive task or not.
CFS is good with its beautiful design. But in my opinion i think the
sleeper feature will destroy the beautiful design.

RIFS-ES adopt the design of System V scheduler.
It can be interactive. On my box everything is very smopth
                  Chen

Download attachment "RIFS.ES-v1-kernel3.4.x" of type "application/octet-stream" (289856 bytes)