[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201206161723.23768.arnd@arndb.de>
Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2012 17:23:23 +0000
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Cc: Roland Stigge <stigge@...com.de>, cjb@...top.org,
grant.likely@...retlab.ca, rob.herring@...xeda.com,
rmk+kernel@....linux.org.uk, ulf.hansson@...ricsson.com,
linus.walleij@...aro.org, sebastian.rasmussen@...ricsson.com,
linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
aletes.xgr@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mmc: mmci.c: Defer probe() in case of yet uninitialized GPIOs
On Saturday 16 June 2012, Roland Stigge wrote:
> + if (of_get_property(np, "wp-gpios", NULL)) {
> + pdata->gpio_wp = of_get_named_gpio(np, "wp-gpios", 0);
> + if (pdata->gpio_wp == -ENODEV)
> + pdata->gpio_wp = -EPROBE_DEFER;
> + } else {
> + pdata->gpio_wp = -ENODEV;
> + }
This is still very ugly and there is a certain danfer that we might
have to duplicate this across more drivers. Can't we make
of_get_named_gpio_flags return -EPROBE_DEFER in cases where we can't
find the GPIO number yet but still have a chance of returning it at
a later point?
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists