[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4FDCD8B1.5000407@antcom.de>
Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2012 21:04:17 +0200
From: Roland Stigge <stigge@...com.de>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
CC: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, cjb@...top.org,
grant.likely@...retlab.ca, rob.herring@...xeda.com,
rmk+kernel@....linux.org.uk, ulf.hansson@...ricsson.com,
linus.walleij@...aro.org, sebastian.rasmussen@...ricsson.com,
linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
aletes.xgr@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mmc: mmci.c: Defer probe() in case of yet uninitialized
GPIOs
On 16/06/12 19:23, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Saturday 16 June 2012, Roland Stigge wrote:
>> + if (of_get_property(np, "wp-gpios", NULL)) {
>> + pdata->gpio_wp = of_get_named_gpio(np, "wp-gpios", 0);
>> + if (pdata->gpio_wp == -ENODEV)
>> + pdata->gpio_wp = -EPROBE_DEFER;
>> + } else {
>> + pdata->gpio_wp = -ENODEV;
>> + }
>
> This is still very ugly and there is a certain danfer that we might
> have to duplicate this across more drivers. Can't we make
> of_get_named_gpio_flags return -EPROBE_DEFER in cases where we can't
> find the GPIO number yet but still have a chance of returning it at
> a later point?
OK, will post a new patch.
Roland
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists