[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120616055007.GA5808@netboy.at.omicron.at>
Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2012 07:50:09 +0200
From: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>
To: Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Fedora Kernel Team <kernel-team@...oraproject.org>
Subject: Re: missing leap second patches in stable.
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 03:09:59PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 11:48:34AM -0700, John Stultz wrote:
> > On 06/15/2012 08:20 AM, Dave Jones wrote:
> > > Should these be in -stable ? Looks like all the other recent changes
> > > in that area are present. With the leap second just two weeks away,
> > > it seems like they should be.
> > >
> > > Looks like 6b43ae8a619d17c4935c3320d2ef9e92bdeed05d is in 3.4-stable,
> > > (haven't checked earlier -stable trees).
> >
> > So the second patch has been sent out for stable review as of yesterday.
> > So it should be on its way, but you're right that I forgot to CC stable
> > on the first TAI offset fix.
> >
> > I'll generate the patch and send it to Greg. Thanks for the close
> > review here!
>
> fwiw, I did a test on 3.5rc2 yesterday where I forced a fake leap second at midnight.
> Nothing untoward happened, unlike the previous ones :-)
Out of curiosity, how do you test that? Do you have any programs
specifically for testing the leap second issue?
Thanks,
Richard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists