linux-kernel - Re: missing leap second patches in stable.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20120615190958.GA9864@redhat.com>
Date:	Fri, 15 Jun 2012 15:09:59 -0400
From:	Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
To:	John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>
Cc:	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>,
	Fedora Kernel Team <kernel-team@...oraproject.org>
Subject: Re: missing leap second patches in stable.

On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 11:48:34AM -0700, John Stultz wrote:
 > On 06/15/2012 08:20 AM, Dave Jones wrote:
 > > Should these be in -stable ? Looks like all the other recent changes
 > > in that area are present.  With the leap second just two weeks away,
 > > it seems like they should be.
 > >
 > > Looks like 6b43ae8a619d17c4935c3320d2ef9e92bdeed05d is in 3.4-stable,
 > > (haven't checked earlier -stable trees).
 > 
 > So the second patch has been sent out for stable review as of yesterday. 
 > So it should be on its way, but you're right that I forgot to CC stable 
 > on the first TAI offset fix.
 > 
 > I'll generate the patch and send it to Greg.  Thanks for the close 
 > review here!

fwiw, I did a test on 3.5rc2 yesterday where I forced a fake leap second at midnight.
Nothing untoward happened, unlike the previous ones :-)

	Dave

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/