linux-kernel - Re: missing leap second patches in stable.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4FDB8382.8090501@linaro.org>
Date:	Fri, 15 Jun 2012 11:48:34 -0700
From:	John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>
To:	Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>,
	Fedora Kernel Team <kernel-team@...oraproject.org>
Subject: Re: missing leap second patches in stable.

On 06/15/2012 08:20 AM, Dave Jones wrote:
> Should these be in -stable ? Looks like all the other recent changes
> in that area are present.  With the leap second just two weeks away,
> it seems like they should be.
>
> Looks like 6b43ae8a619d17c4935c3320d2ef9e92bdeed05d is in 3.4-stable,
> (haven't checked earlier -stable trees).

So the second patch has been sent out for stable review as of yesterday. 
So it should be on its way, but you're right that I forgot to CC stable 
on the first TAI offset fix.

I'll generate the patch and send it to Greg.  Thanks for the close 
review here!

thanks
-john

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/