[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120618224253.GH32733@google.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2012 15:42:53 -0700
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Muthu Kumar <muthu.lkml@...il.com>
Cc: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
Jej B <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH UPDATED] block: In blk_execute_rq_nowait, init
rq->end_io before checking for dead queue.
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 02:23:23PM -0700, Muthu Kumar wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 10:33 AM, Muthu Kumar <muthu.lkml@...il.com> wrote:
> > On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 10:40 AM, Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org> wrote:
> >> On 06/09/12 23:57, Muthu Kumar wrote:
> >>
> >>> Locking change is the one you posted already (the link above). Anyway,
> >>> I have the attached patch *including* the locking change. Original
> >>> mail has attachment without locking change. Please use whatever you
> >>> need.
> >>
> >>
> >> While we are at it ... the rq->rq_disk and rq->end_io assignments can be
> >> performed safely before the spinlock is taken, isn't it ?
> >>
> >
> > Yes.. that spinlock is to protect the q.
> >
>
> Attached patch with assignment performed before taking the spinlock.
This looks correct to me. Bart, can you please include this patch in
your series and repost the series?
Thank you.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists