lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120618230939.GI32733@google.com>
Date:	Mon, 18 Jun 2012 16:09:39 -0700
From:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To:	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] memblock: Make sure reserved.regions is freed really

Hey, Yinghai.

On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 03:58:52PM -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> > Hmmm... nice catch but I think it's a bit complex and ugly.  In this
> > case, we *know* that the region isn't gonna be split.  Maybe a better
> > option is to add something like the following?
> 
> how do you know __pa(memblock.reserved.regions) would not be merged
> with other entries
> in reserved.regions?
>
> >
> > void memblock_remove_region_by_ptr(struct memblock_type *type,
> >                                   struct memblock_region *r)
> > {
> >        WARN_ON(/* make sure @r is inside @type->regions */);
> >        memblock_remove_region(type, r - type->regions);
> > }
> 
> you want to change

Heh, you're right.  My suggestion was completely bonkers.  Sorry about
that.  Hmm.... how about separating out removal pre-expansion and
doing it before calling into free?  ie. something like

static int memblock_prepare_for_isolation(struct memblock_type *type)
{
	/* we'll create at most two more regions */
	while (type->cnt + 2 > type->max)
		if (memblock_double_array(type) < 0)
			return -ENOMEM;
	return 0;
}

int __init_memblock memblock_free_reserved_regions(void)
{
	int ret;

	if (memblock.reserved.regions == memblock_reserved_init_regions)
		return 0;

	ret = memblock_prepare_for_isolation(&memblock.reserved);
	if (ret)
		return ret;

	ret = memblock_free(__pa(memblock.reserved.regions),
		sizeof(struct memblock_region) * memblock.reserved.max);
	WARN_ON(ret || memblock.reserved.regions has changed);
	return ret;
}

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ