[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAF+7xWnS7+hxgoVbxYghi3Zj007U4tAsNZ6XnwkWEWdyK12+uA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2012 13:19:12 +0800
From: Axel Lin <axel.lin@...il.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>,
Liam Girdwood <lrg@...com>,
Yadwinder Singh Brar <yadi.brar01@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] regulator: tps62360: Simplify tps62360_set_voltage_time_sel
implementation
2012/6/18 Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>:
> On Fri, Jun 08, 2012 at 02:35:32PM +0800, Axel Lin wrote:
>> For linear mappings, we can use below equation to get the voltage difference
>> between new_selector and old_selector:
>
> Applied, thanks. There's a new framework feature that Yadwinder Singh
> has contributed which should allow this to be moved to the regulator
> desc.
In this case, tps->change_uv_per_us is is calculated by :
tps->change_uv_per_us = DIV_ROUND_UP(32000, BIT(ramp_ctrl));
Which means tps->change_uv_per_us may be not alignment to mV.
This make me think if we should change the unit of ramp_delay
to uV/uS rather than mV/uS. So we can avoid truncate issue.
Regards,
Axel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists