lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAF+7xWnS7+hxgoVbxYghi3Zj007U4tAsNZ6XnwkWEWdyK12+uA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 18 Jun 2012 13:19:12 +0800
From:	Axel Lin <axel.lin@...il.com>
To:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>,
	Liam Girdwood <lrg@...com>,
	Yadwinder Singh Brar <yadi.brar01@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] regulator: tps62360: Simplify tps62360_set_voltage_time_sel
 implementation

2012/6/18 Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>:
> On Fri, Jun 08, 2012 at 02:35:32PM +0800, Axel Lin wrote:
>> For linear mappings, we can use below equation to get the voltage difference
>> between new_selector and old_selector:
>
> Applied, thanks.  There's a new framework feature that Yadwinder Singh
> has contributed which should allow this to be moved to the regulator
> desc.

In this case, tps->change_uv_per_us is is calculated by :
tps->change_uv_per_us = DIV_ROUND_UP(32000, BIT(ramp_ctrl));

Which means tps->change_uv_per_us may be not alignment to mV.

This make me think if we should change the unit of ramp_delay
to uV/uS rather than mV/uS. So we can avoid truncate issue.

Regards,
Axel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ