linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] regulator: tps62360: Simplify tps62360_set_voltage_time

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4FDEB9ED.8070608@nvidia.com>
Date:	Mon, 18 Jun 2012 10:47:33 +0530
From:	Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>
To:	"axel.lin@...il.com" <axel.lin@...il.com>
CC:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Liam Girdwood <lrg@...com>,
	Yadwinder Singh Brar <yadi.brar01@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] regulator: tps62360: Simplify tps62360_set_voltage_time_sel
 implementation

On Monday 18 June 2012 10:49 AM, Axel Lin wrote:
> 2012/6/18 Mark Brown<broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>:
>> On Fri, Jun 08, 2012 at 02:35:32PM +0800, Axel Lin wrote:
>>
> This make me think if we should change the unit of ramp_delay
> to uV/uS rather than mV/uS. So we can avoid truncate issue.
>
Yes, we should have the ramp delay in uV/uS. many times, the ramp delay 
come as 0.025mV/uS  which will not be possible if we do mv/us.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/