linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] types.h: implement intptr_t and uintptr

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20120620075216.GA24798@infradead.org>
Date:	Wed, 20 Jun 2012 03:52:16 -0400
From:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To:	Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...i.de>
Cc:	xfs@....sgi.com, hch@...radead.org, joe@...ches.com, bpm@....com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] types.h: implement intptr_t and uintptr_t

I'd really like to get Jans type cleanups in XFS in for the next
merge window.  Given the lack of feedback on lkml in favor or
against (u)intptr_t I'm tempted to add them to xfs_linux.h for now,
and then do another push to propagate them to kernel-wide types later.

Is that fine with everybody?

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/