[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120620105847.65cf37f2@endymion.delvare>
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 10:58:47 +0200
From: Jean Delvare <khali@...ux-fr.org>
To: Daniel Kurtz <djkurtz@...omium.org>
Cc: ben-linux@...ff.org, seth.heasley@...el.com, ben@...adent.org.uk,
David.Woodhouse@...el.com, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, olofj@...omium.org,
bleung@...omium.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3 v2] i2c: i801: enable irq for i801 smbus
transactions
On Tue, 19 Jun 2012 20:47:04 +0200, Jean Delvare wrote:
> On Fri, 6 Jan 2012 18:58:21 +0800, Daniel Kurtz wrote:
> > @@ -879,8 +953,24 @@ static int __devinit i801_probe(struct pci_dev *dev,
> > i801_probe_optional_slaves(priv);
> >
> > pci_set_drvdata(dev, priv);
> > +
> > + if (priv->features & FEATURE_IRQ) {
> > + init_waitqueue_head(&priv->waitq);
> > + spin_lock_init(&priv->lock);
> > +
> > + err = request_irq(dev->irq, i801_isr, IRQF_SHARED,
> > + i801_driver.name, priv);
> > + if (err) {
> > + dev_err(&dev->dev, "Failed to allocate irq %d: %d",
>
> Missing "\n".
>
> > + dev->irq, err);
> > + goto exit_del_adapter;
> > + }
>
> I believe order is wrong, and interrupt handler should be installed
> _before_ registering the adapter. Otherwise you have a race condition
> where the handler could be called before the waitqueue and spinlock are
> initialized.
Oh, and it's not a theoretical thing. I can reproducibly crash the
kernel by removing and loading the i2c-i801 driver again. Swapping
request_irq() and i2c_add_adapter() solves it.
--
Jean Delvare
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists