[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdYSLiLZwVwY1tU9PWGTx2EGP6OykeXE5rtwRKAHror-Yg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 10:59:32 +0200
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>,
devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org
Cc: broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com, grant.likely@...retlab.ca,
rob.herring@...xeda.com, arnd@...db.de, lrg@...com,
lee.jones@...aro.org, swarren@...dotorg.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 0/3] regulator: dt: add policy to match regulator with
prop "regulator-compatible"
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 4:28 PM, Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com> wrote:
> add policy to match regulator with the property of "regulator-compatible" of each
> child regulator node with their hardware counterparts name.
> Modify documentation as well to reflect this change and dts files.
>
> Changes from V1:
> - Modify the existing of_regulator_match() to use the property
> "regulator-compatible" of each child node of regulator for
> matching rather than child node name.
> - Documentation change to reflect this policy who are using the
> of_regulator_match().
> - Modify the dts file to absorb this policy.
If I had today deployed the device trees generated prior to this patch,
and try to boot kernels after this patch with the same device tree,
would they still work as expected?
I don't know it it's an issue right now, but at some point we need to
realize that people will expect old device trees to work on newer
kernels.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists