[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120620142044.GU28394@pengutronix.de>
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 16:20:44 +0200
From: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>
To: Rob Lee <rob.lee@...aro.org>
Cc: kernel@...gutronix.de, shawn.guo@...aro.org,
linux@....linux.org.uk, richard.zhao@...escale.com,
dirk.behme@...bosch.com, amit.kachhap@...aro.org,
amit.kucheria@...aro.org, lenb@...nel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linaro-dev@...ts.linaro.org, patches@...aro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] ARM: imx: Add basic imx6q cpu thermal management
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 09:12:51AM -0500, Rob Lee wrote:
> Sascha, thanks for the review.
>
> >> +
> >> +static struct imx6q_thermal_zone *th_zone;
> >> +static void __iomem *ocotp_base;
> >
> > This is a driver and drivers should generally be multi instance safe.
> >
>
> I don't understand what this comment is referring to. Could you elaborate?
Drivers can only be multi instance safe when all variables are inside a
instance specific struct and you pass a pointer to this struct around.
What if the i.MX7 has two different ocotp_base and you want to use this
driver on both ocotp?
Sascha
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists