[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMXH7KHJ5LHCZM2iY_mRm=1L2B5cdxPD_B0htRwX_1HBfn1oxQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 09:33:05 -0500
From: Rob Lee <rob.lee@...aro.org>
To: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>
Cc: kernel@...gutronix.de, shawn.guo@...aro.org,
linux@....linux.org.uk, richard.zhao@...escale.com,
dirk.behme@...bosch.com, amit.kachhap@...aro.org,
amit.kucheria@...aro.org, lenb@...nel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linaro-dev@...ts.linaro.org, patches@...aro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] ARM: imx: Add basic imx6q cpu thermal management
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 9:20 AM, Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 09:12:51AM -0500, Rob Lee wrote:
>> Sascha, thanks for the review.
>>
>> >> +
>> >> +static struct imx6q_thermal_zone *th_zone;
>> >> +static void __iomem *ocotp_base;
>> >
>> > This is a driver and drivers should generally be multi instance safe.
>> >
>>
>> I don't understand what this comment is referring to. Could you elaborate?
>
> Drivers can only be multi instance safe when all variables are inside a
> instance specific struct and you pass a pointer to this struct around.
> What if the i.MX7 has two different ocotp_base and you want to use this
> driver on both ocotp?
>
Understood, thanks. I'll fix this in v6.
> Sascha
>
> --
> Pengutronix e.K. | |
> Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
> Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
> Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists