[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4FE22B28.9020402@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 21:57:28 +0200
From: Brice Goglin <brice.goglin@...il.com>
To: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
CC: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Ulrich Drepper <drepper@...il.com>, jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
lenb@...nel.org, x86@...nel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: SNB PCI root information
Le 20/06/2012 21:28, Yinghai Lu a écrit :
> On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 11:46 AM, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com> wrote:
>
>> As far as I can tell, here's Yinghai's recommendation: the user
>> argument should not override BIOS _PXM because if the BIOS gets the
>> _PXM wrong, the user won't be able to work around it with the
>> argument, which will force the vendor to fix the BIOS.
>>
>> I'm not buying it. The convention that user-supplied arguments always
>> take precedence is useful, easy to document, and matches user
>> expectations. It allows the user to work around both missing _PXM and
>> incorrect _PXM.
> if the vendor provide _PXM, that _PXM should be right and be trusted.
>
I agree that the most common problem is that _PXM is missing. But I've
seen at least some HP Westmere-EP platforms where _PXM exists but it is
wrong. Last time we checked, there was no BIOS update, even if we
reported the bug a while ago.
Brice
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists